4/28/2010

Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe [Part VI]

Communication www n°6 / April 26, 2010.


Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe [Part VI]


            The introduction of (Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe) Part I mentionned the resources-sharing process that has to be applied once savings have been achieved. Substantial investments are required into three directions: the payment of the DEBT, conventional VITAL budgets, and NEW vital spendings.
             1 )   The DEBT.
                    Naturally, the European countries plagued by an overwhelming DEBT should view the step by step reimbursement of that DEBT as their top priority.
                     Example: every year France has to pay around €50 billions for the sole yearly COST of its DEBT - with the colossal DEBT remaining the same... The implementation of Dr. VICTOR's Plan  (for the Economic Recovery in Europe) in its entirety would provide France with an extra amount of more than €100 billions per year. Was France to opt for that extra bonanza, the wise sharing would allocate at least 60% of this (previously) unexpected budget to the repayment of the DEBT itself, thus lowering the COST of the DEBT for the following year(s) - the payment of the COST of the DEBT being included in the usual budgets. The remaining 40% (or less) of this extra revenue would then be appropriately shared between the VITAL conventional and NEW vital budgetary lines.
              2 )   The conventional VITAL budgetary lines. *
                      Depending on its own situation, each European country benefiting from the savings stemming from the implementation of Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe could reinforce any or all of its conventional VITAL budgets, among which are those of the following Departments: Defense, Counter-Intelligence, Police, Justice, Education, Family Support, Healthcare, Retirement Pensions, Scientific Research and Development, Territorial Development, (...)
               3 )   The NEW vital budgets. *
                       A new emphasis set on conventional VITAL budgetary lines may result in their alignment in this category of "NEW vital budgets".
                        Heading for a total Agricultural Independence for Europe requires a very important increase of financing almost everywhere on our continent, for example.
                        Similarly, gigantic investments are absolutely needed to guarantee the re-development and redeployment of our industrial base - before we lose it altogether... [See the next Communications from Dr. VICTOR]
                         But the most important investment for our Future must be the adoption of an extremely vigorous pro-Birth policy wherever it's needed in Europe. *


[ * :Refer to Dr. VICTOR's (2006) Constitution for the United States of Europe in Dr. VICTOR's "Nothing But the United States of Europe!" - unpublished yet.]


            [ N.B. : See the next Communications from Dr. VICTOR in the coming weeks :
                         - VITAL for Europe: the Re-Industrialization of our Continent;
                         - VITAL for Europe: the re-establishment of our Independence about petroleum, gas, and
                            strategic minerals;
                         - VITAL for Europe: the right Space Conquest programme;
                         - The VITAL Societal New Deal for Europe;
                          -        (...)   ]

4/22/2010

Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe [Part V]

Communication www n°5 / April 20, 2010.


Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe [Part V]


          Although more intricate to be implemented, due to the permanent concern of the majority of European governments to abide by rampant conformism and political correctness, the scrapping of several big budgets allocated by European States to E.U. and international institutions and structures could save another huge amount of European taxpayers'money.
           The sole translating into more than 20 languages of the E.U. bureaucratic stuff costs around €1billion per year! And shuttling the M.E.P.s between Brussels and Strasbourg (France) adds another €200millions to the bill... [ For other basic details, see Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe, Part I (point 3); For the whole programme, refer to Dr. VICTOR's (2006) Constitution for the United States of Europe in Dr. VICTOR's unpublished "Nothing But The United States Of Europe". ]
            Anyway, sooner or later, every European State will have to choose its future, far beyond its ordinary horizon (the coming electoral contest): to remain a (more or less passive and more or less economically incompetent) cog in that fictional entity designated "the European Union" - that famously powerless political dwarf - or to FREELY enter the building process of a future Great Power ("the United States of Europe" or simply "Europe" or "Europa" as it could be named) using its scarce but growing ressources to permanently improve the way of life of its population, increase its industrial strength, its scientific know-how, its political will and military might, while asserting itself on the world scene.
             Therefore what is needed, basically, is BOTH a continental "Common Market" - possibly with Russia, Japan and any friendly country willing to play by the same rules - and a core of a few European States aware before the others of their own historical duty: to act as pioneers/"Founding Fathers" in the institutional changes that will give birth to the REAL Europe, at last voluntarily and quietly unified in accordance with its identity made of its Roots, its History and its resulting geostrategic destiny.
              On the international scale, shall we vanish, economically marginalized and politically subordinated? Or shall we operate as required in order to re-establish our ante-bellum power? The richest continent on Earth, Europe has no say in this outdated "U.N.O."... This is not tolerable any longer. Europe will stop to be one of the most generous contributors there, and will invite all those who wish to join it in creating a "World Council", also headed by the USA, Russia, Japan, India and China - which, no doubt (!), will decide to transmute itself into another free giant country eventually. The first significant difference between the World Council and the antiquated UNO will be the costs: all assemblies and reunions will occur through visioconferences. No more bureaucracy! No more the countless-floor building! And, above all, not a cent from European taxpayers' money!
 
            

4/19/2010

Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe [PartIV]

Communication www n° 4 / April 18, 2010


Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe [Part IV]


          5 )  Another very big chunk among possible savings is the termination of numerous - sometimes incredibly costly - subsidies distributed by European States to private European firms, corporations and companies.
                 Frequently these subsidies are only a complicated process to fairly compensate them for too heavy taxes and "social" charges. This situation is ridiculous. Of course, the right thing to do is to liquidate both these generous subsidies and that awful burden consisting in sheer socialist taxes and charges!
                 As regards the tiny minority of these subsidies which are objectively useful - because directly linked to vital sectors of Europe's sovereignty (like Industry, Defense and Agriculture) -, an automatic transfer of financing should be implemented: to lower the costs, there's nothing better than guaranteed MULTI-YEAR programmes of purchase by the States.
                  [ For further details about these "vital" programmes, see Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe Part VI, and refer to Dr. VICTOR's (2006) Constitution for the United States of Europe in Dr. VICTOR's (yet unpublished) book entitled "Nothing but the United States of Europe". ]

4/16/2010

Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe [Part III]

Communication www n°3 / April 16, 2010.


Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe [Part III]


         4 )  The single most important source of savings lies in the scrapping of the budgets for all of the non-vital university programmes.  [See Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe, Part I, for the definition of what is "vital" or "non-vital" in this category.]
                There's no doubt that studying Literature, Philosophy, Psychology, History, languages (and so on...) may be quite fascinating, but it's not up to the States to pay for that. Those who wish to spend years enjoying that kind of studies must pay the full cost of these studies, including the functioning costs of the universities teaching these interesting substances.
                 When decided, the termination of these budgetary lines might occur within a few months.

4/14/2010

Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe (Part II)

Communication www n°2 / April  14, 2010.

Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe (Part II)


          As beforesaid, the simplest and fastest way to generate huge savings for every European State - from hundreds of millions to numerous billions, depending on the size of these usual spendings - is the immediate termination of different non-vital budgetary lines which (if decided) is quite achievable within a few months or even a few weeks.

          1 )   Systematically terminate the budgets for all of the State TVs and radios. 
                  Regarding that kind of activities, the States only have to prevent disinformation and the falsification of History. To secure this end, a kind of (possibly more or less privately-sponsored) "Federal Foundation against Disinformation and the Falsification of History" should have an automatic on air Right to Intervene, in order to negate the destabilization intentionnally brought by these processes of disinformation/falsification of History on the "public opinion" - that mass of the silly, ignorant of History and permanently underinformed.

          2 )   Systematically terminate the budgets for all of the public "Cultural departments" and for all of the "cultural" and "leisure" NGOs.
                  It is not up to the States to promote contemporary "Culture", and, as regards their country's really historical patrimony as well as a fair participation to the conservation of the so-called "World Patrimony", the European States should only organize (and then check) as many private structures as necessary to offer European citizens who wish it opportunities to become voluntary owners - i.e. free share-holders and no longer captive taxpayers - of this or that particular monument, natural park, theater or library.

          3 )   Equally simple and fast (if decided) to get are the important savings resulting from the annulment of all of the public budgets for sport events, festivities, political celebrations and international summits.
                  In times of dire economic crisis - and optionally permanently - , these expenses should become the first targets on the agenda of any responsible government.



                   [ Soon to come: Dr. VICTOR's Plan for the Economic Recovery in Europe parts III, IV, V and VI. ]